🔗 Share this article

Only two days prior to the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – not just who would win citywide, but block by block. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in New York City, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and has become a kind of well-known figure recently for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors favored the independent, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

I had to do that because they were adding around 200,000 votes into the system frequently! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were large groups of votes added after that and the advantage went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world in which election day turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, where Cuomo was going to end up basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However the winner added 500,000 votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect get additional support from?

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the primary. Additionally he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: multiracial, young, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president last year went for Zohran this year. However it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the election was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I figured we might go over two million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. Existed a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to surpass half. He has just over 50% but remain probably 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. Thus I don’t think certain, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it so then no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.

He lost any district in any area. Including Tottenville in the borough, which is like an highly conservative area. That truly surprised me. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and then added many Republicans on the island with a strong turnout. I believe occurred a lot of strategic balloting by the Republicans. This happened prior to the former president tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your often-discussed “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate dominant in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the Greek landlords and residents all went for Cuomo. So there existed a little resistance. But overall, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he was polling between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on whether the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential there. Likewise in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were pretty staunchly supportive. So it’s unclear if existed major surprises here, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what New York represents in politics? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – people will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that each urban center in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities we face.