🔗 Share this article

It all began with a single photograph, possibly the most impactful ever snapped of a individual from the royal household.

There stood the Baron Killyleagh, arm-in-arm a female youth, while an associate grinned conspiratorially in the backdrop.

Lacking that photograph, shot at a gathering in 2001, few would have credited the allegations of a teenager who declared she was transported across the ocean and compelled to have brief relations with a individual of the royal bloodline?

A curious, revealing move by someone who had openly asserted to have not heard of her, asserted he could no have had intimate contact with her, and yet paid a substantial sum of family money to resolve a drawn-out legal case.

Over a Decade of Controversy

In this context, discussions of the monarchy acting decisively to cut Andrew off are misguided. This controversy has endured for the largest portion of 15 years since that image, and an additional snapshot of Andrew walking congenially with a disgraced financier surfaced.

• Hubris: How long did his siblings, maybe even his parents, know that Andrew was so presumptuous?
• Problematic Connections: They must have realized, if his employees and the law enforcement were fulfilling their roles, that he had some deeply disreputable companions given he unabashedly invited them to royal residences.
• Fiscal Irresponsibility: If the family did not know about his intimate behaviors, they certainly knew about his extravagance with public money.

Travel were listed in royal annual reports: private aircraft travel from the royal residence to a sporting venue and back again in time for lunch, chartered planes instead of commercial flights, all for the benefit of "Airmiles Andy".

World of Deference

Furthermore the entitlement which demanded subservience when he entered a room or the supreme obsession about his royal titles used on his correspondence in messages to his associates.

He managed to escape consequences while his matriarch, who unaccountably spoiled him, was still surviving. The monarch did at least remove him of official roles and honorary colonelcies in the wake of his disastrous and, as revealed, untruthful media appearance six years ago.

Recent Developments

Merely in the last two weeks that events accelerated, following the release of biographical works giving more grim details of his conduct and that of his companions.

Further disclosures have again revealed Andrew's assumption that he could avoid lying about his contact with a convicted criminal.

The public (and the press) were far more perceptive of the royals. There was no one of any consequence to support him, a consequence of all those years of hubris.

Royal Worries

The wiser royals recognized that. The primary concern is to pass on the crown, if not as previously at least complete and unstained.

They have spent the last 190 years trying to overcome the reputation of earlier rulers, showing they are beneficial, accountable and reactive to their subjects.

Andrew was putting all that in peril in an era when deference and secrecy is no longer enough.

The Fallout

Ultimately, the notoriously indecisive monarch was pressured more. There was little choice. The palace had surrendered command of the narrative.

Currently the stripping of honorifics and the continued and permanent social disgrace that will afflict Andrew most deeply.

• Downgrading: Lowered to just a private citizen
• Historical Precedent: The first member to lose his honorifics in contemporary era
• Military Service: Particularly painful given his service in the engagement

He remains a counsellor of state, theoretically able to act for the monarch, and he is still in the lineage to the monarchy, but neither of these will actually come to pass.

What Lies Ahead

Can persons he comes across still acknowledge him? Might they still slip up and call him Sir? Would they say Mr,

Certainly, he is not moving to an ordinary town, but to the monarchy's vast property at a monarchical property.

At that location, he will be furnished by the sovereign with one of the royal residences and given some form of financial support.

It is not his prior accommodation, where he paid a token rent for more than 20 years, and Norfolk is a bit remote, but even so it may not be sufficiently removed.

Outstanding Concerns

This is not over. There are still records in the possession of overseas authorities to be revealed.

• Parliamentary Interest: Could lawmakers demand more
• Fiscal Review: Or investigate the misuse of taxpayer funds
• Legal Possibility: There may even be a law enforcement inquiry into his behavior

Perhaps for the time being the reputational impact to the institution is restricted. The narrative from the royal household was plainly that the removal of designations was what the king, and notably other senior royals, sought.

Changed Stance

No more pretence that Andrew was making the choice himself. And, notably, the brief communication showed plainly that the monarchy were aligning with the accuser's narrative of events.

Even more, for the first time they eventually showed regard for the affected individuals: "These actions are considered essential, regardless of the fact that he maintains his innocence of the allegations against him."

Ultimately it is entitlement, self-seeking and inactivity that will destroy the crown. In his stupidity, personal excess and venality, Andrew seems never to have grasped that lesson.