🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “utter hypocrisy” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Documents seen by journalists sent from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the African officials asks for measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.

The company is attempting modifications of a proposed legislation that include decreasing the suggested dimensions of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavoured tobacco products, and diminished punishments for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Activist commentary

“If I was a politician, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” said the health advocate.

Thousands of residents a year pass away from smoking-associated diseases, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The advocate mentioned the letter was believed to have been distributed to multiple official agencies and was in circulation among community advocacy networks.

International corporate influence worries

This occurs during expanded apprehension about industry interference with medical guidelines. Recently, WHO officials issued a warning that the smoking product companies was intensifying efforts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“There is proof of industry lobbying worldwide. Tobacco company fingerprints are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN summit conference,” stated Jorge Alday.

Likely impacts

“If a tobacco control measure isn’t passed because of this letter, the price could be paid in individuals' health who might potentially stop smoking.”

The public health measure progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and stipulating that pictorial cautions cover 75% of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Via documentation, the company recommends this be lowered to less than half “according to global suggested parameters”, delayed for at least one year after the bill passes.

The WHO actually suggests a warning should cover at least 50% of the product container front “and aim to cover as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Within Britain, warnings need to encompass nearly two-thirds of a packet’s front and back.

Flavor restrictions debate

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on scented smoking items, arguing that it would push consumers toward “illegally traded” products. The corporation recommends prohibiting a smaller list of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation suggests penalties for various offences “extending from a percentage of annual turnover to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Business explanation

Via documentation, the company executive of the African subsidiary claims the company is dedicated to responsible corporate conduct” and “backs the goals of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the connected wellbeing effects” but claims that “certain measures can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The advocate stated BAT’s proposed changes would “weaken this legislation so much that the impact needed for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that multiple comparable regulations were present in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “total double standard”, he stated.

“We live in a global village. If I plant tobacco in my garden and gather the crop and sell it out – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to profit individually and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbour’s children are perishing … is in itself complete moral failure.”

Public health laws in the United Kingdom or other countries had not caused companies to close, the campaigner stated. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Formal company response

A BAT Zambia spokesperson stated: “The corporation runs its operations according with relevant national regulations. Additionally, the firm contributes in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the relevant frameworks which allow for stakeholder participation in legislation creation.”

The company was “not opposed to regulation”, the representative commented, mentioning that underage people should be shielded from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We champion developing rules to realize planned public health goals, while accepting the variety of privileges and responsibilities on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” they said, adding that BAT’s proposals “represent the situation of the Zambian market and tobacco industry, which encompasses growing volumes of illicit trade”.

Zambia’s department of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was approached for comment.